llama: make good pets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.77
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.60
, sheep
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings alpaca
Weight: 0.39
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.39
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.38
, goat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
make good pets 1.00
is good pack animals 0.81
keep away coyotes 0.78
is animal 0.75
is unique animal 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(goat, is animal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(goat, is animal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(goat, is animal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(llama, make good pets)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(llama, is animal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(llama, is animal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(llama, is animal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(llama, is unique animal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(llama, is unique animal)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(llama, is unique animal)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(llama, is unique animal)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(llama, is animal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(llama, make good pets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(llama, make good pets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(llama, make good pets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(goat, is animal)