llama: spit much on people

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.77
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, species
Weight: 0.60
, sheep
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.55
Siblings alpaca
Weight: 0.39
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.39
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.38
, goat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
spit much on people 1.00
spit 0.91
spit at humans 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(llama, spit much on people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, spit)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(llama, spit much on people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(alpaca, spit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(alpaca, spit)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(llama, spit much on people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(llama, spit much on people)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(llama, spit much on people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(llama, spit)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(llama, spit much on people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(llama, spit)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(llama, spit much on people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(llama, spit)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(llama, spit much on people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(llama, spit at humans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(llama, spit much on people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(llama, spit at humans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(llama, spit much on people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(llama, spit at humans)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(llama, spit much on people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(llama, spit)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(llama, spit much on people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(llama, spit at humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(llama, spit much on people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(llama, spit much on people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(llama, spit much on people)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(llama, spit much on people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(llama, spit much on people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(llama, spit much on people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(alpaca, spit)