load: be reduced

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
, consideration
Weight: 0.55
, activity
Weight: 0.54
Siblings stress
Weight: 0.64
, ton
Weight: 0.50
, ohm
Weight: 0.40
, loading
Weight: 0.35
, throughput
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be reduced 1.00
be reduced by activity 0.87
be reduced by physical activity 0.85
is increased 0.84
is when increased 0.82
reduce with time 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(load, be reduced)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(stress, be reduced by physical activity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(load, be reduced)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(stress, be reduced by physical activity)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(stress, be reduced by physical activity)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(load, be reduced)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(load, be reduced)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(load, be reduced)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(load, is increased)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(load, be reduced)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(load, is when increased)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(load, be reduced)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(load, is increased)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(load, be reduced)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(load, is when increased)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(load, be reduced)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(load, is increased)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(load, be reduced)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(load, is when increased)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(load, be reduced)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(load, is when increased)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(load, be reduced)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(load, is increased)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(load, be reduced)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(load, be reduced)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(load, be reduced)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(load, be reduced)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(load, be reduced)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(load, be reduced)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(stress, be reduced by physical activity)