loading: has quality effect

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, use
Weight: 0.53
Siblings load
Weight: 0.35
, storing
Weight: 0.32
, extraction
Weight: 0.32
, handling
Weight: 0.32
, storage
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality effect 1.00
effect business 0.87
have impact 0.82
effect child development 0.81
impact use 0.80
effect behavior 0.80
have impact on development 0.80
effect human behavior 0.79
had impact 0.78
had negative impact 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(factor, effect child development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(loading, has quality effect)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, effect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(loading, has quality effect)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(loading, has quality effect)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(factor, have impact) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(loading, has quality effect)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(issue, impact use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(loading, has quality effect)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(factor, have impact)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(issue, impact use)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(factor, effect business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(factor, have impact on development)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(factor, effect child development)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(factor, effect child development)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, have impact on development)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(factor, effect business)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(issue, impact use)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(factor, have impact)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, effect business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(loading, has quality effect)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(factor, effect child development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(loading, has quality effect)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(factor, have impact on development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(loading, has quality effect)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(factor, have impact) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(loading, has quality effect)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(issue, impact use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(loading, has quality effect)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(loading, has quality effect)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loading, has quality effect)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(loading, has quality effect)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(factor, have impact)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(issue, impact use)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(factor, effect business)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(factor, effect child development)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(factor, have impact)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(issue, impact use)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(factor, effect business)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(factor, have impact on development)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(loading, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(factor, effect child development)