loading: require energy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operation
Weight: 0.59
, function
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, use
Weight: 0.53
Siblings load
Weight: 0.35
, storing
Weight: 0.32
, extraction
Weight: 0.32
, handling
Weight: 0.32
, storage
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
require energy 1.00
impact use of renewable energy 0.82
be such big problem for solar energy 0.80
impact use of energy 0.80
consume energy 0.79
be such big problem for energy 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, impact use of renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(loading, require energy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(issue, impact use of energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(loading, require energy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(issue, impact use of energy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(issue, impact use of renewable energy)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(issue, impact use of renewable energy)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(issue, impact use of energy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(storage, be such big problem for solar energy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(storage, be such big problem for energy)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(load, consume energy)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(issue, impact use of renewable energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(loading, require energy)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(issue, impact use of energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(loading, require energy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(load, consume energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(load, consume energy)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(storage, be such big problem for energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(storage, be such big problem for energy)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(storage, be such big problem for solar energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(storage, be such big problem for solar energy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(loading, require energy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loading, require energy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(loading, require energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of energy)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of renewable energy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(load, consume energy)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(storage, be such big problem for energy)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(storage, be such big problem for solar energy)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of energy)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(loading, require energy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(issue, impact use of renewable energy)