lobbyist: have image

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents individual
Weight: 0.58
, member
Weight: 0.54
, group
Weight: 0.53
, law firm
Weight: 0.53
, advocate
Weight: 0.53
Siblings family member
Weight: 0.32
, representative
Weight: 0.32
, chairman
Weight: 0.32
, accounting firm
Weight: 0.31
, taxpayer
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have image 1.00
have negative image 0.92
have reputation 0.76
have bad reputation 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(lobbyist, have image)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lobbyist, have negative image)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(lobbyist, have reputation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lobbyist, have bad reputation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(lobbyist, have reputation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(lobbyist, have negative image)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(lobbyist, have reputation)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(lobbyist, have negative image)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lobbyist, have negative image)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(lobbyist, have bad reputation)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lobbyist, have bad reputation)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(lobbyist, have reputation)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lobbyist, have bad reputation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(lobbyist, have image)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lobbyist, have image)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lobbyist, have image)