lobster: die

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crustacean
Weight: 0.74
, shellfish
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.63
, entree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings crab
Weight: 0.39
, shrimp
Weight: 0.39
, hermit crab
Weight: 0.38
, scallop
Weight: 0.37
, atlantic salmon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
die 1.00
die in freshwater 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lobster, die)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, die)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lobster, die)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(crab, die)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lobster, die)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(shrimp, die)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(shrimp, die)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lobster, die)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(crab, die)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(crab, die)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lobster, die)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(lobster, die)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lobster, die)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(lobster, die in freshwater)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(lobster, die)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(lobster, die in freshwater)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(lobster, die)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lobster, die in freshwater)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(lobster, die)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(lobster, die in freshwater)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(lobster, die)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lobster, die)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lobster, die)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(lobster, die)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(lobster, die)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lobster, die)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(shrimp, die)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lobster, die)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(crab, die)