local: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents neighborhood
Weight: 0.53
, work
Weight: 0.52
, volunteer
Weight: 0.51
, visitor
Weight: 0.51
, person
Weight: 0.51
Siblings greenwich village
Weight: 0.32
, other person
Weight: 0.31
, south park
Weight: 0.30
, homeless person
Weight: 0.30
, municipality
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
is food better 0.81
is sustainable food better 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(local, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(local, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(local, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(local, is food better)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(local, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(local, is sustainable food better)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(local, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(local, is food better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(local, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(local, is sustainable food better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(local, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(local, is food better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(local, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(local, is food better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(local, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(local, is sustainable food better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(local, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(local, is sustainable food better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(local, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(local, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(local, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(local, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(local, has quality better)