local: hate on weekenders

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents neighborhood
Weight: 0.53
, work
Weight: 0.52
, volunteer
Weight: 0.51
, visitor
Weight: 0.51
, person
Weight: 0.51
Siblings greenwich village
Weight: 0.32
, other person
Weight: 0.31
, south park
Weight: 0.30
, homeless person
Weight: 0.30
, municipality
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
hate on weekenders 1.00
hate on tourists 0.78
hate tourists 0.78
hate much tourists 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(local, hate on weekenders)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(local, hate much tourists)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(local, hate on tourists)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(local, hate tourists)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(local, hate much tourists)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(local, hate tourists)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(local, hate on tourists)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(local, hate much tourists)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(local, hate on tourists)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(local, hate tourists)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(local, hate much tourists)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(local, hate on tourists)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(local, hate tourists)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(local, hate on weekenders)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(local, hate on weekenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(local, hate on weekenders)