location: be related to landforms

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.68
, spot
Weight: 0.66
, historical site
Weight: 0.65
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
Siblings convenience store
Weight: 0.77
, construction site
Weight: 0.75
, central park
Weight: 0.71
, apartment building
Weight: 0.70
, shopping mall
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to landforms 1.00
form volcanoes 0.77
produce volcanoes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(spot, form volcanoes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(location, be related to landforms)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(location, be related to landforms)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(spot, form volcanoes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(location, be related to landforms)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(spot, form volcanoes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(spot, form volcanoes)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(location, be related to landforms)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(location, be related to landforms)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(location, be related to landforms)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(location, be related to landforms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(location, be related to landforms)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(location, be related to landforms)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(location, be related to landforms)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(location, be related to landforms)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(location, be related to landforms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(location, be related to landforms)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(spot, form volcanoes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(location, be related to landforms)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(spot, form volcanoes)