location: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.68
, spot
Weight: 0.66
, historical site
Weight: 0.65
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
Siblings convenience store
Weight: 0.77
, construction site
Weight: 0.75
, central park
Weight: 0.71
, apartment building
Weight: 0.70
, shopping mall
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
has quality bad 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(location, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(location, has quality wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(location, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(location, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(location, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(location, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(location, has quality wrong)