location: is significant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents parameter
Weight: 0.68
, spot
Weight: 0.66
, historical site
Weight: 0.65
, consideration
Weight: 0.62
Siblings convenience store
Weight: 0.77
, construction site
Weight: 0.75
, central park
Weight: 0.71
, apartment building
Weight: 0.70
, shopping mall
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
is significant 1.00
is big 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spot, is significant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(location, is significant)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(location, is significant)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(spot, is significant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(location, is significant)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(spot, is significant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(location, is significant)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(central park, is big)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(spot, is significant)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(location, is significant)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(location, is significant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(location, is significant)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(central park, is big)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(central park, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(location, is significant)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(location, is significant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(location, is significant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(location, is significant)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(location, is significant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(location, is significant)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(location, is significant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(location, is significant)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(spot, is significant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(location, is significant)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(central park, is big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(location, is significant)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(spot, is significant)