logan: be in white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents county
Weight: 0.56
, name
Weight: 0.53
, jerk
Weight: 0.52
, man
Weight: 0.51
, place
Weight: 0.51
Siblings albert einstein
Weight: 0.34
, adam smith
Weight: 0.34
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in white 1.00
be in black 0.92
has color white 0.92
has color black 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(michael jackson, has color white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(michael jackson, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(michael jackson, has color white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(logan, be in white)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(logan, be in black)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(logan, has color white)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(logan, has color black)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(logan, be in black)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(logan, be in black)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(logan, has color black)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(logan, has color white)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(logan, has color black)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(logan, has color white)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(logan, be in black)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(logan, has color black)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(logan, has color white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(logan, be in white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(logan, be in white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(logan, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(michael jackson, has color white)