logic: be important in law

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.65
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.60
Siblings boolean algebra
Weight: 0.63
, point
Weight: 0.63
, prolog
Weight: 0.49
, multiplexer
Weight: 0.48
, theory
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in law 1.00
be important to law 1.00
relate to law 0.88
relates to law 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(logic, be important in law)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(logic, be important to law)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(logic, be important to law)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(logic, be important to law)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(logic, relate to law)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(logic, relate to law)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(logic, relates to law)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(logic, relate to law)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(logic, relates to law)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(logic, relates to law)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(logic, be important to law)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(logic, relate to law)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(logic, relates to law)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(logic, be important in law)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(logic, be important in law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(logic, be important in law)