logic: be used to understand

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents discipline
Weight: 0.65
, concept
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, device
Weight: 0.59
Siblings point
Weight: 0.63
, prolog
Weight: 0.49
, theory
Weight: 0.35
, principle
Weight: 0.35
, philosophy
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to understand 1.00
be at we do not understand 0.88
causes you learn thing 0.79
be happen without your know 0.76
requires that one think objectively 0.76
do not work well 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(logic, be used to understand)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(thing, be happen without your know)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(logic, be used to understand)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(logic, be used to understand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(thing, do not work well)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(thing, be happen without your know)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at we do not understand)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(thing, do not work well)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(thing, be happen without your know)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(theory, be used to understand)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, causes you learn thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(philosophy, requires that one think objectively)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(thing, be at we do not understand)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(logic, be used to understand)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(thing, be happen without your know)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(logic, be used to understand)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(thing, do not work well)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(logic, be used to understand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(theory, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(theory, be used to understand)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(philosophy, causes you learn thing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(philosophy, causes you learn thing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(philosophy, requires that one think objectively)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(philosophy, requires that one think objectively)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(logic, be used to understand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(logic, be used to understand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(thing, be happen without your know)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(theory, be used to understand)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(philosophy, requires that one think objectively)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(philosophy, causes you learn thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(thing, be at we do not understand)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(thing, be happen without your know)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(logic, be used to understand)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(thing, do not work well)