lollipop: taste good dipped

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents candy
Weight: 0.60
, song
Weight: 0.60
, hit
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, reward
Weight: 0.48
Siblings gum
Weight: 0.35
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.34
, rock candy
Weight: 0.34
, cotton candy
Weight: 0.34
, candy cane
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good dipped 1.00
taste dipped 0.99
taste good dipped in water 0.98
taste dipped in water 0.97
taste good 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(candy, taste good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lollipop, taste good dipped)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(candy, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(candy, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(candy, taste good)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(lollipop, taste good dipped)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(lollipop, taste good dipped)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(lollipop, taste dipped in water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(lollipop, taste good dipped in water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lollipop, taste dipped)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(lollipop, taste dipped)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(lollipop, taste dipped)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(lollipop, taste good dipped in water)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(lollipop, taste dipped)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(lollipop, taste dipped in water)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lollipop, taste good dipped in water)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(lollipop, taste good dipped in water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(lollipop, taste dipped in water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(lollipop, taste dipped in water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(lollipop, taste good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(lollipop, taste good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(lollipop, taste good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(lollipop, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lollipop, taste good dipped)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lollipop, taste good dipped)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(candy, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(lollipop, taste good dipped)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(candy, taste good)