london: be good place for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, north america
Weight: 0.63
, birmingham
Weight: 0.62
, singapore
Weight: 0.62
, paris
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good place for business 1.00
was good place for olypics 0.91
be good place live 0.87
be good place hold 0.86
be bad place live 0.85
be great place hold 0.85
was important as place 0.84
is place 0.84
be good place invest in 0.83
be good place invest 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(birmingham, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(london, be good place for business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(new york, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(london, be good place for business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(new york, be good place live)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(birmingham, be good place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, be good place live)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(new york, be good place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(washington, be good place live)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(birmingham, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(london, be good place for business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(new york, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(london, be good place for business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(washington, be good place live) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(washington, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(london, be good place for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(london, be good place for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(london, be good place for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new york, be good place live)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(birmingham, be good place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(washington, be good place live)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new york, be good place live)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(london, be good place for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(birmingham, be good place live)