london: be hot in summer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, north america
Weight: 0.63
, birmingham
Weight: 0.62
, singapore
Weight: 0.62
, paris
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hot in summer 1.00
is hot 0.89
have warmer winter than new york 0.76
have warmer winter temperatures than montreal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(london, be hot in summer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(south america, is hot)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(london, be hot in summer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(south america, is hot)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(south america, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(london, be hot in summer)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(london, is hot)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(london, is hot)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(london, is hot)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(london, is hot)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(london, have warmer winter than new york)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(london, have warmer winter than new york)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(london, have warmer winter than new york)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(london, have warmer winter than new york)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(london, be hot in summer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(london, be hot in summer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(south america, is hot)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(london, be hot in summer)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(paris, have warmer winter temperatures than montreal)