london: is popular

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.66
, north america
Weight: 0.63
, birmingham
Weight: 0.62
, singapore
Weight: 0.62
, paris
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new york city
Weight: 0.37
, south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.37
, washington
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is popular 1.00
is famous 0.78
be famous for locto 0.77
be popular for tourists 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(singapore, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(london, is popular)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(new york, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(london, is popular)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(new york, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(london, is popular)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(paris, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(london, is popular)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(birmingham, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(london, is popular)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(new york, is popular)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(singapore, is popular)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(birmingham, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(paris, is famous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(new york, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(singapore, is popular)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(birmingham, is famous)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(paris, is famous)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(new york, is famous)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(new york, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is popular)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is famous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(singapore, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(london, is popular)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(new york, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(london, is popular)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(new york, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(london, is popular)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(paris, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(london, is popular)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(birmingham, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(london, is popular)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(new york city, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(new york city, is popular)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(new york city, is famous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(new york city, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(london, is popular)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(london, is famous)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(london, be popular for tourists)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(london, is famous)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(london, is famous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(london, be popular for tourists)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(london, be popular for tourists)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(london, is famous)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(london, be popular for tourists)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(london, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(new york, is popular)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(singapore, is popular)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(birmingham, is famous)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(paris, is famous)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(new york city, is popular)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(new york city, is famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(new york, is popular)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(singapore, is popular)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(birmingham, is famous)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(paris, is famous)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(london, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new york, is famous)