longitude: have important lines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.51
, factor
Weight: 0.50
, information
Weight: 0.49
, parameter
Weight: 0.49
, location
Weight: 0.49
Siblings filename
Weight: 0.30
, magnetic field
Weight: 0.30
, origin
Weight: 0.30
, west point
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
have important lines 1.00
have lines 0.96
has shape lines 0.89
lines of are length 0.83
lines of are same length 0.83
have used for for scientists lines 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(magnetic field, have lines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(magnetic field, have lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(magnetic field, have lines)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(longitude, have important lines)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(longitude, have lines)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(longitude, have lines)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(longitude, have lines)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(longitude, lines of are same length)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(longitude, lines of are same length)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(longitude, lines of are same length)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(longitude, lines of are length)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(longitude, has shape lines)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(longitude, lines of are length)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(longitude, lines of are same length)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(longitude, lines of are length)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(longitude, has shape lines)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(longitude, has shape lines)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(longitude, have lines)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(longitude, lines of are length)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(longitude, have used for for scientists lines)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(longitude, has shape lines)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(longitude, have used for for scientists lines)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(longitude, have used for for scientists lines)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(longitude, have used for for scientists lines)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(longitude, have important lines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(longitude, have important lines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(longitude, have important lines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(magnetic field, have lines)