loo: have windows

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bathroom
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, man
Weight: 0.44
, facility
Weight: 0.44
, time
Weight: 0.42
Siblings toilet paper
Weight: 0.33
, toilet
Weight: 0.33
, shower curtain
Weight: 0.32
, toilet seat
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have windows 1.00
have tiny windows 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bathroom, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(loo, have windows)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(loo, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(bathroom, have windows)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(loo, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have windows)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(bathroom, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(loo, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(loo, have windows)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(loo, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(loo, have windows)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(loo, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(loo, have tiny windows)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(loo, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(loo, have tiny windows)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(loo, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(loo, have tiny windows)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(loo, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(loo, have tiny windows)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(loo, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(loo, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(loo, have windows)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(loo, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(loo, have windows)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(loo, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(bathroom, have windows)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(loo, have windows) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(bathroom, have windows)