look: crooked in mirrors

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.60
, anything
Weight: 0.58
, situation
Weight: 0.57
, publication
Weight: 0.57
Siblings knee
Weight: 0.59
, come
Weight: 0.48
, rough
Weight: 0.46
, casual
Weight: 0.46
, view
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
crooked in mirrors 1.00
mirrors work 0.85
mirrors in cars 0.82
mirrors in automobiles made of convex 0.79
mirrors havre two reflections 0.78
mirrors in automobiles made 0.76
mirrors in automobiles 0.76
mirrors work in night mode 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(view, mirrors in cars)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(view, mirrors in automobiles made of convex)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(view, mirrors in automobiles made)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(view, mirrors in automobiles)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(view, mirrors work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(view, mirrors work in night mode)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(view, mirrors havre two reflections)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(view, mirrors work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(view, mirrors work)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(view, mirrors in cars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(view, mirrors in cars)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(view, mirrors havre two reflections) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(view, mirrors havre two reflections)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(view, mirrors work in night mode) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(view, mirrors work in night mode)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(view, mirrors in automobiles made of convex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(view, mirrors in automobiles made of convex)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(view, mirrors in automobiles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(view, mirrors in automobiles)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(view, mirrors in automobiles made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(view, mirrors in automobiles made)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(look, crooked in mirrors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(look, crooked in mirrors)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(look, crooked in mirrors)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(view, mirrors work)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(view, mirrors havre two reflections)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(view, mirrors in cars)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(view, mirrors in automobiles made of convex)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(view, mirrors in automobiles)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(view, mirrors in automobiles made)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(look, crooked in mirrors) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(view, mirrors work in night mode)