look: is fantastic cheap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.60
, anything
Weight: 0.58
, situation
Weight: 0.57
, publication
Weight: 0.57
Siblings knee
Weight: 0.59
, come
Weight: 0.48
, rough
Weight: 0.46
, casual
Weight: 0.46
, view
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fantastic cheap 1.00
is fantastic 0.94
has quality good 0.80
is really bad 0.79
has quality bad 0.76
amazing random 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(look, is fantastic cheap)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(casual, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(look, is fantastic cheap)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(casual, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(casual, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(look, is fantastic cheap)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(look, is fantastic cheap)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(look, is fantastic cheap)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(look, is fantastic)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(look, is fantastic cheap)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(look, is fantastic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(look, is fantastic cheap)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(look, is fantastic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(look, is fantastic cheap)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(look, is fantastic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(look, is fantastic cheap)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(look, is fantastic cheap)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(look, is fantastic cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(look, is fantastic cheap)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(look, is fantastic cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(look, is fantastic cheap)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(casual, has quality bad)