:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(lorry, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(tractor, is video)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(lorry, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(lorry, is video)
Similarity expansion
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(lorry, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lorry, video)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(lorry, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(lorry, video)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(lorry, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(lorry, video)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(lorry, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(lorry, video)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(lorry, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(lorry, is video)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(lorry, is video)
⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(tractor, is video)