losing: be bad week

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.47
, disappointment
Weight: 0.40
, time
Weight: 0.39
, blow
Weight: 0.39
Siblings defeat
Weight: 0.30
, loss
Weight: 0.30
, win
Weight: 0.30
, playing game
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad week 1.00
be bad 0.83
feel bad 0.77
has quality bad 0.76
is more than 2 pounds week dangerous 0.76
be good thing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(disappointment, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(losing, be bad week)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(disappointment, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(losing, be bad week)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(loss, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(loss, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(losing, be bad week)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(losing, be bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(losing, be bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(losing, be bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(losing, be good thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(losing, be good thing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(losing, be bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(losing, be good thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(losing, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(losing, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(losing, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(losing, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(losing, be good thing)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(losing, is more than 2 pounds week dangerous)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(losing, is more than 2 pounds week dangerous)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(losing, is more than 2 pounds week dangerous)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(losing, is more than 2 pounds week dangerous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(losing, be bad week)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(losing, be bad week)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(loss, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(losing, be bad week)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality bad)