loss: be in game 3

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disappointment
Weight: 0.64
, gain
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.60
, punishment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings absorption
Weight: 0.59
, net
Weight: 0.58
, lost
Weight: 0.58
, sack
Weight: 0.58
, departure
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in game 3 1.00
is game 0.90
is games 0.82
be season season 1 0.80
work in play 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(loss, be in game 3) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(sack, is games)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(loss, be in game 3) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(lost, be season season 1)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(loss, be in game 3) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(sack, is game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(loss, be in game 3) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(sack, is game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(sack, is game)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(loss, be in game 3) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(sack, is games) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sack, is games)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(loss, be in game 3) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(lost, be season season 1) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(lost, be season season 1)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(loss, be in game 3) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(loss, be in game 3)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(loss, be in game 3) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(loss, be in game 3) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(loss, be in game 3)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(loss, be in game 3) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(loss, be in game 3)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(loss, be in game 3) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(sack, is game)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(loss, be in game 3) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sack, is games)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(loss, be in game 3) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(lost, be season season 1)