loss: be reduced through conduction in vacuum flask

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disappointment
Weight: 0.64
, gain
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.60
, punishment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings absorption
Weight: 0.59
, net
Weight: 0.58
, lost
Weight: 0.58
, sack
Weight: 0.58
, departure
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be reduced through conduction in vacuum flask 1.00
be reduced through conduction 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(loss, be reduced through conduction in vacuum flask)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(loss, be reduced through conduction in vacuum flask)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(loss, be reduced through conduction in vacuum flask)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(loss, be reduced through conduction)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(loss, be reduced through conduction in vacuum flask)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(loss, be reduced through conduction)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(loss, be reduced through conduction in vacuum flask)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(loss, be reduced through conduction)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(loss, be reduced through conduction in vacuum flask)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(loss, be reduced through conduction)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(loss, be reduced through conduction in vacuum flask)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(loss, be reduced through conduction in vacuum flask)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(loss, be reduced through conduction in vacuum flask)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(loss, be reduced through conduction in vacuum flask)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(loss, be reduced through conduction in vacuum flask)