loss: seem more significant than gain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents disappointment
Weight: 0.64
, gain
Weight: 0.61
, injury
Weight: 0.60
, punishment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings absorption
Weight: 0.59
, net
Weight: 0.58
, lost
Weight: 0.58
, sack
Weight: 0.58
, departure
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
seem more significant than gain 1.00
is significant 0.80
than than past 0.78
is more expensive 0.76
seem insignificant 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(punishment, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(loss, seem more significant than gain)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(loss, seem more significant than gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(punishment, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loss, seem more significant than gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(punishment, is more expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(punishment, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(loss, seem more significant than gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(loss, seem more significant than gain)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(loss, seem more significant than gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(loss, seem more significant than gain)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(loss, seem more significant than gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(loss, is significant)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(loss, seem more significant than gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(loss, is significant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(loss, seem more significant than gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(loss, is significant)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(loss, seem more significant than gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(loss, is significant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(loss, seem more significant than gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(loss, seem more significant than gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loss, seem more significant than gain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(loss, seem more significant than gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(loss, seem more significant than gain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(loss, seem more significant than gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(punishment, is more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Typical(loss, seem more significant than gain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(punishment, is more expensive)