lot: be at person

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.57
Siblings think
Weight: 0.34
, everybody
Weight: 0.34
, good person
Weight: 0.34
, other person
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at person 1.00
be at person live in big city 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lot, be at person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(lot, be at person)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lot, be at person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(lot, be at person live in big city)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lot, be at person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(lot, be at person live in big city)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(lot, be at person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lot, be at person live in big city)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(lot, be at person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(lot, be at person live in big city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(lot, be at person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lot, be at person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(lot, be at person)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(lot, be at person) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(lot, be at person)