lot: be in kobe japan

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, parking lot
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings everybody
Weight: 0.34
, alot
Weight: 0.34
, guy
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in kobe japan 1.00
be in washington hawaii 0.82
hate justin bieber 0.79
be in california 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(lot, be in kobe japan)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(lot, hate justin bieber)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(lot, hate justin bieber)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(lot, hate justin bieber)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(lot, hate justin bieber)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lot, be in washington hawaii)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lot, be in california)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(lot, be in california)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(lot, be in california)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(lot, be in washington hawaii)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lot, be in california)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(lot, be in washington hawaii)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(lot, be in washington hawaii)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(lot, be in kobe japan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(lot, be in kobe japan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lot, be in kobe japan)