lot: have assigned on labels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, parking lot
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings everybody
Weight: 0.34
, alot
Weight: 0.34
, guy
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have assigned on labels 1.00
have assigned on labels of products numbers 0.94
have assigned on labels of pharmaceutical products numbers 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lot, have assigned on labels)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(lot, have assigned on labels)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lot, have assigned on labels)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(lot, have assigned on labels of products numbers)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lot, have assigned on labels)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(lot, have assigned on labels of pharmaceutical products numbers)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(lot, have assigned on labels)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(lot, have assigned on labels of products numbers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(lot, have assigned on labels)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(lot, have assigned on labels of pharmaceutical products numbers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lot, have assigned on labels)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lot, have assigned on labels of products numbers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(lot, have assigned on labels)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(lot, have assigned on labels of pharmaceutical products numbers)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(lot, have assigned on labels)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lot, have assigned on labels of products numbers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(lot, have assigned on labels)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(lot, have assigned on labels of pharmaceutical products numbers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(lot, have assigned on labels)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lot, have assigned on labels)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(lot, have assigned on labels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lot, have assigned on labels)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(lot, have assigned on labels)