lot: hit on muscular men

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, parking lot
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings everybody
Weight: 0.34
, alot
Weight: 0.34
, guy
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
hit on muscular men 1.00
hit on muscular men online 0.96
hit on men 0.87
hit on men online 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(lot, hit on muscular men)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lot, hit on muscular men online)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lot, hit on men)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(lot, hit on muscular men online)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lot, hit on muscular men online)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(lot, hit on muscular men online)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(lot, hit on men online)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lot, hit on men)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(lot, hit on men)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lot, hit on men online)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(lot, hit on men online)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(lot, hit on men)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(lot, hit on men online)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(lot, hit on muscular men)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(lot, hit on muscular men) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lot, hit on muscular men)