lot: is less cheap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, parking lot
Weight: 0.58
, problem
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings everybody
Weight: 0.34
, alot
Weight: 0.34
, guy
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is less cheap 1.00
is cheap 0.93
less 0.85
is expensive 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lot, is less cheap)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(issue, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lot, is less cheap)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(issue, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(issue, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lot, is less cheap)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(issue, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(lot, is less cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(lot, is less cheap)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(lot, less)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(lot, less)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(lot, less)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(lot, is cheap)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lot, is cheap)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(lot, is cheap)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lot, less)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(lot, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(lot, is cheap)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lot, is expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(lot, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(lot, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lot, is less cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lot, is less cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(issue, is expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(lot, is less cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)