loud music: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents loud noise
Weight: 0.83
, noise
Weight: 0.71
, thing
Weight: 0.66
, music
Weight: 0.65
, entertainment
Weight: 0.62
Siblings chamber music
Weight: 0.38
, air horn
Weight: 0.38
, pop music
Weight: 0.38
, classical music
Weight: 0.38
, rock music
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
be better than soft 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(loud music, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(classical music, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(loud music, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(classical music, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(classical music, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(loud music, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(loud music, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(loud music, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(loud music, be better than soft)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(loud music, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(loud music, be better than soft)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(loud music, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(loud music, be better than soft)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(loud music, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(loud music, be better than soft)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(loud music, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(loud music, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(loud music, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(loud music, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(loud music, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(loud music, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(classical music, has quality better)