louisiana: was acquired

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, country
Weight: 0.58
Siblings louis armstrong
Weight: 0.64
, mississippi
Weight: 0.58
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.58
, alabama
Weight: 0.35
, south carolina
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was acquired 1.00
was purchased gained 0.81
was purchased 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, was acquired)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, was purchased)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(louisiana, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(mississippi, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(mississippi, was acquired)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(louisiana, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alabama, was purchased) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(alabama, was purchased)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(louisiana, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(louisiana, was acquired)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(louisiana, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(louisiana, was purchased gained)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(louisiana, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(louisiana, was purchased)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(louisiana, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(louisiana, was purchased gained)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(louisiana, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(louisiana, was purchased)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(louisiana, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, was purchased gained)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(louisiana, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(louisiana, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, was acquired)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(louisiana, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(louisiana, was acquired)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(mississippi, was acquired)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, was acquired) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(alabama, was purchased)