lover: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.65
, man
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.55
, prince
Weight: 0.55
Siblings husband
Weight: 0.66
, brother
Weight: 0.65
, romeo
Weight: 0.60
, old man
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
has state office 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lover, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(lover, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(lover, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(lover, has state office)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(lover, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(lover, has state office)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lover, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(lover, has state office)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(lover, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(lover, has state office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(lover, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lover, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lover, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(lover, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(lover, has state state)