loyalist: was important to war

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prisoner
Weight: 0.38
, life
Weight: 0.34
, january
Weight: 0.33
, force
Weight: 0.33
, country
Weight: 0.32
Siblings prison guard
Weight: 0.26
, militia
Weight: 0.26
, dissident
Weight: 0.26
, garrison
Weight: 0.26
, rapist
Weight: 0.26

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to war 1.00
was important to revolutionary war 0.87
were treated during war 0.81
were treated during revolutionary war 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prisoner, were treated during war)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(loyalist, was important to war)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(prisoner, were treated during war)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(prisoner, were treated during war)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prisoner, were treated during war)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(loyalist, was important to war)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(loyalist, was important to war)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(loyalist, was important to revolutionary war)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(loyalist, were treated during war)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(loyalist, were treated during revolutionary war)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(loyalist, were treated during revolutionary war)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(loyalist, were treated during war)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(loyalist, was important to revolutionary war)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(loyalist, was important to revolutionary war)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(loyalist, were treated during war)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(loyalist, were treated during war)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(loyalist, was important to revolutionary war)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(loyalist, were treated during revolutionary war)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(loyalist, were treated during revolutionary war)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loyalist, was important to war)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(loyalist, was important to war)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(prisoner, were treated during war)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(loyalist, was important to war)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(prisoner, were treated during war)