lubrication: be detrimental in extrusion with porthole

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents application
Weight: 0.58
, maintenance
Weight: 0.57
, factor
Weight: 0.56
, operation
Weight: 0.55
, issue
Weight: 0.52
Siblings viscosity
Weight: 0.34
, compressor
Weight: 0.33
, conveyor belt
Weight: 0.33
, bushing
Weight: 0.32
, search engine
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be detrimental in extrusion with porthole 1.00
be detrimental in extrusion with porthole die 0.99
be detrimental in extrusion 0.90
affect glass blower 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(viscosity, affect glass blower)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(viscosity, affect glass blower) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(viscosity, affect glass blower)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole die)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole die)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole die)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole die)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lubrication, be detrimental in extrusion with porthole) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(viscosity, affect glass blower)