luggage: be at luggage compartment

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.58
, time
Weight: 0.56
, service
Weight: 0.56
, container
Weight: 0.55
, car
Weight: 0.55
Siblings trash bag
Weight: 0.34
, suitcase
Weight: 0.34
, cargo
Weight: 0.33
, air travel
Weight: 0.32
, police car
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at luggage compartment 1.00
be at baggage compartment 0.95
be at luggage store 0.90
be at luggage rack 0.87
has glove compartment 0.87
be at cargo ship 0.77
be at cargo hold 0.77
be at trunk 0.76
has trunk 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(car, has trunk)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(container, be at cargo ship)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(luggage, be at luggage compartment)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(container, be at cargo ship)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(car, has trunk)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(car, has trunk)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(container, be at cargo ship)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(suitcase, be at baggage compartment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(suitcase, be at luggage store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(suitcase, be at cargo hold)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(car, has trunk)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(container, be at cargo ship)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(luggage, be at luggage compartment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(suitcase, be at luggage store)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(suitcase, be at luggage store)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(suitcase, be at baggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(suitcase, be at baggage compartment)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(suitcase, be at cargo hold)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(suitcase, be at cargo hold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(luggage, be at luggage compartment)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(luggage, be at luggage rack)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(luggage, be at trunk)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(luggage, be at trunk)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage rack)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(luggage, be at luggage rack)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(luggage, be at trunk)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(luggage, be at luggage rack)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(luggage, be at trunk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage compartment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(luggage, be at luggage compartment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(car, has trunk)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(container, be at cargo ship)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(suitcase, be at baggage compartment)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(suitcase, be at luggage store)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(suitcase, be at cargo hold)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(car, has trunk)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(luggage, be at luggage compartment)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(container, be at cargo ship)