lumber: be important to canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.70
, material
Weight: 0.61
, cargo
Weight: 0.61
, product
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stave
Weight: 0.42
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.39
, wood
Weight: 0.38
, timber
Weight: 0.37
, steel
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to canada 1.00
be expensive in canada 0.95
be blue in canada 0.92
is important georgia product 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(lumber, be important to canada)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lumber, be expensive in canada)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(lumber, be expensive in canada)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(lumber, be expensive in canada)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(lumber, be blue in canada)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(lumber, be blue in canada)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(lumber, be blue in canada)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(lumber, be expensive in canada)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(lumber, be blue in canada)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(lumber, is important georgia product)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lumber, is important georgia product)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(lumber, is important georgia product)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(lumber, is important georgia product)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lumber, be important to canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(lumber, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lumber, be important to canada)