lumber: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents raw material
Weight: 0.70
, material
Weight: 0.61
, cargo
Weight: 0.61
, product
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stave
Weight: 0.42
, wood pulp
Weight: 0.39
, wood
Weight: 0.38
, timber
Weight: 0.37
, steel
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
become expensive 0.91
become more expensive 0.88
is cheaper 0.85
be cheaper than dirt 0.77
be expensive in canada 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lumber, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(product, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lumber, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(product, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(product, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(timber, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lumber, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(product, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(lumber, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(timber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(timber, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(lumber, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(lumber, become expensive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(lumber, become expensive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(lumber, become more expensive)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(lumber, become more expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(lumber, become expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(lumber, is cheaper)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(lumber, become more expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(lumber, is cheaper)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(lumber, is cheaper)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lumber, be cheaper than dirt)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(lumber, be cheaper than dirt)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(lumber, be expensive in canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(lumber, be expensive in canada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(lumber, be expensive in canada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lumber, be cheaper than dirt)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(lumber, become more expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(lumber, be expensive in canada)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lumber, become expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(lumber, is cheaper)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lumber, be cheaper than dirt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lumber, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(lumber, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(product, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(timber, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(lumber, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(product, is cheaper)