lupus: be called imitator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.64
, illness
Weight: 0.64
, disease
Weight: 0.63
, heart disease
Weight: 0.62
, immune system
Weight: 0.59
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, lung cancer
Weight: 0.37
, epilepsy
Weight: 0.37
, rheumatoid arthritis
Weight: 0.37
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called imitator 1.00
be called great imitator 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lupus, be called imitator)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be called great imitator)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lupus, be called imitator)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be called imitator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lupus, be called imitator)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(lyme disease, be called imitator)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be called imitator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lupus, be called imitator)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(lyme disease, be called great imitator)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be called great imitator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lupus, be called imitator)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(lupus, be called imitator)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lupus, be called imitator)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(lupus, be called great imitator)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(lupus, be called imitator)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lupus, be called great imitator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(lupus, be called imitator)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(lupus, be called great imitator)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(lupus, be called imitator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(lupus, be called great imitator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(lupus, be called imitator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lupus, be called imitator)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lupus, be called imitator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(lupus, be called imitator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(lupus, be called imitator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lupus, be called imitator)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be called imitator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(lupus, be called imitator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be called great imitator)