lupus: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents condition
Weight: 0.64
, illness
Weight: 0.64
, disease
Weight: 0.63
, heart disease
Weight: 0.62
, immune system
Weight: 0.59
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.38
, lung cancer
Weight: 0.37
, epilepsy
Weight: 0.37
, rheumatoid arthritis
Weight: 0.37
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality worse 0.87
is bad people 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lupus, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(heart disease, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(epilepsy, has quality worse)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(lung cancer, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(heart disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(lupus, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(lung cancer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(lung cancer, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(epilepsy, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(epilepsy, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(epilepsy, has quality worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(epilepsy, has quality worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(lupus, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lupus, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(lupus, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(epilepsy, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(lung cancer, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(epilepsy, has quality worse)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(lupus, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(heart disease, has quality bad)