lurch: up

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents count
Weight: 0.27
, challenge
Weight: 0.22
Siblings recession
Weight: 0.21
, trouble
Weight: 0.21
, question
Weight: 0.21
, rock climbing
Weight: 0.21
, disappointment
Weight: 0.21

Related properties

Property Similarity
up 1.00
show up on instagram 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(lurch, up)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(question, show up on instagram)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(lurch, up)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(question, show up on instagram)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(question, show up on instagram)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(lurch, up)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(lurch, up)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(lurch, up)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(lurch, up)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(lurch, up)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(lurch, up)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(lurch, up)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(lurch, up)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(question, show up on instagram)