:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(lure, work at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(jig, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(lure, work at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(spinner, work)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(lure, work at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(jig, work)
⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(jig, work)
Salient implies Plausible
Similarity expansion
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(lure, work at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(lure, work)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(lure, work at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(lure, work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(lure, work at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(lure, work)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(lure, work at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(lure, work)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(lure, work at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(spinner, work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(lure, work at night)
⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(jig, work)