lux: be considered support

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.47
, experiment
Weight: 0.46
, unit
Weight: 0.45
, brand
Weight: 0.38
, program
Weight: 0.34
Siblings aperture
Weight: 0.30
, light switch
Weight: 0.29
, watt
Weight: 0.29
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.29
, cd player
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered support 1.00
is support 0.91
be considered weak support 0.88
be considered low-tier 0.85
is bad support 0.84
be hated as support 0.81
is support pick 0.80
is unpopular support pick 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brand, is support)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lux, be considered support)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(brand, is support)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(brand, is support)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(brand, is support)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(lux, be considered support)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(lux, be considered support)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(lux, be considered weak support)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(lux, be considered weak support)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(lux, be considered weak support)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(lux, be considered weak support)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(lux, be hated as support)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(lux, is bad support)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(lux, be hated as support)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(lux, be hated as support)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(lux, is bad support)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(lux, is bad support)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lux, be considered low-tier)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(lux, is unpopular support pick)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(lux, is unpopular support pick)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(lux, be considered low-tier)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(lux, be considered low-tier)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(lux, be hated as support)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(lux, is unpopular support pick)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lux, be considered low-tier)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(lux, is support)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lux, is unpopular support pick)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(lux, is bad support)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(lux, is support pick)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(lux, is support)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lux, is support pick)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(lux, is support)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(lux, is support pick)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(lux, is support)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(lux, is support pick)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lux, be considered support)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(lux, be considered support)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(brand, is support)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(lux, be considered support)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(brand, is support)