lyme disease: be more common in northeast

Related concepts

Parents	disease Weight: 0.86 , infection Weight: 0.81 , illness Weight: 0.77 , virus Weight: 0.72
Siblings	pelvic inflammatory disease Weight: 0.41 , candidiasis Weight: 0.39 , bubonic plague Weight: 0.39 , cancer Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more common in northeast	1.00
be in northeast	0.92
be prevalent in northeast	0.92
become more common	0.79
become common	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(illness, become more common) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(lyme disease, be more common in northeast)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(illness, become common) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(lyme disease, be more common in northeast)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(illness, become common)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(illness, become more common)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(illness, become more common)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(illness, become common)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(cancer, become more common)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(cancer, become common)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(illness, become more common) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be more common in northeast)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(illness, become common) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be more common in northeast)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

Remarkable(cancer, become more common) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(cancer, become more common)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(cancer, become common) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(cancer, become common)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(lyme disease, be more common in northeast)

Similarity expansion

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(lyme disease, be in northeast)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(lyme disease, be in northeast)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be in northeast)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(lyme disease, be prevalent in northeast)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(lyme disease, be prevalent in northeast)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be in northeast)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be prevalent in northeast)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(lyme disease, become common)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be prevalent in northeast)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(lyme disease, become common)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(lyme disease, become more common)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(lyme disease, become common)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(lyme disease, become more common)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(lyme disease, become more common)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, become more common)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, become common)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be more common in northeast)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(lyme disease, be more common in northeast)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(illness, become common)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(illness, become more common)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(cancer, become common)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(cancer, become more common)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(illness, become common)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(lyme disease, be more common in northeast) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(illness, become more common)