lymph node: be bigger than other

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.70
, breast cancer
Weight: 0.69
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.68
, lymphatic system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings salivary gland
Weight: 0.68
, spleen
Weight: 0.63
, tonsil
Weight: 0.63
, lymph
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bigger than other 1.00
be larger than other 0.96
get bigger 0.94
is larger 0.88
be more important than other cancer 0.81
is big one 0.81
survive in greater variety 0.79
get big 0.79
be much larger in rats 0.79
is big 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(breast cancer, be more important than other cancer)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lymph node, be bigger than other)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(breast cancer, is big one)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lymph node, be bigger than other)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(breast cancer, is big one)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(breast cancer, be more important than other cancer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(breast cancer, is big one)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breast cancer, be more important than other cancer)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, be bigger than other)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(salivary gland, be much larger in rats)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, be larger than other)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, get bigger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, is larger)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, get big)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, is big)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(breast cancer, be more important than other cancer)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lymph node, be bigger than other)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(breast cancer, is big one)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(lymph node, be bigger than other)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tonsil, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tonsil, be bigger than other)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(tonsil, get bigger)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(tonsil, get bigger)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(tonsil, be larger than other)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(tonsil, be larger than other)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tonsil, is larger)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tonsil, is larger)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(salivary gland, be much larger in rats)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(salivary gland, be much larger in rats)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(tonsil, get big)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tonsil, get big)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(tonsil, is big)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(tonsil, is big)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(lymph node, be bigger than other)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(lymph node, be bigger than other)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(breast cancer, is big one)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(breast cancer, be more important than other cancer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(tonsil, get bigger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tonsil, is larger)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tonsil, be bigger than other)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(salivary gland, be much larger in rats)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tonsil, be larger than other)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tonsil, get big)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(tonsil, is big)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(breast cancer, is big one)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(lymph node, be bigger than other)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(breast cancer, be more important than other cancer)