lymph node: get inflamed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.70
, breast cancer
Weight: 0.69
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.68
, lymphatic system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings salivary gland
Weight: 0.68
, spleen
Weight: 0.63
, tonsil
Weight: 0.63
, lymph
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
get inflamed 1.00
is inflamed 0.99
inflamed 0.99
become inflamed 0.97
swell during inflammation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, get inflamed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, inflamed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, is inflamed)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, become inflamed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(tonsil, become inflamed)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(tonsil, become inflamed)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(tonsil, is inflamed)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(tonsil, is inflamed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(tonsil, inflamed)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tonsil, inflamed)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(tonsil, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(tonsil, get inflamed)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(lymph node, get inflamed)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, become inflamed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(lymph node, become inflamed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(lymph node, become inflamed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(lymph node, is inflamed)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(lymph node, is inflamed)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, get inflamed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(lymph node, get inflamed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(tonsil, is inflamed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(tonsil, become inflamed)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(tonsil, inflamed)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, get inflamed)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(tonsil, get inflamed)