lymph node: increase in size

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tissue
Weight: 0.70
, breast cancer
Weight: 0.69
, bone marrow
Weight: 0.68
, lymphatic system
Weight: 0.64
Siblings salivary gland
Weight: 0.68
, spleen
Weight: 0.63
, tonsil
Weight: 0.63
, lymph
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
increase in size 1.00
increased in size 0.95
be on increase 0.87
has size large 0.87
shrink with age 0.77
is larger 0.76
shrink 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(breast cancer, be on increase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lymph node, increase in size)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(breast cancer, be on increase)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(breast cancer, be on increase)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, shrink)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, shrink with age)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, has size large)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(tonsil, is larger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(spleen, increased in size)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(breast cancer, be on increase) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(lymph node, increase in size)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(spleen, increased in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(spleen, increased in size)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(tonsil, has size large) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tonsil, has size large)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(tonsil, is larger) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(tonsil, is larger)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(tonsil, shrink) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(tonsil, shrink)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(tonsil, shrink with age) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(tonsil, shrink with age)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(lymph node, increase in size)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, increase in size)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(lymph node, increase in size)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(breast cancer, be on increase)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(spleen, increased in size)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tonsil, shrink)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tonsil, has size large)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tonsil, is larger)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(tonsil, shrink with age)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(lymph node, increase in size) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(breast cancer, be on increase)